The Jacobite succession is the line through which the crown in pretence has descended since the flight of James II & VII from London at the time of the Glorious Revolution. James and his Jacobite successors were traditionally toasted as The King over the Water.
Claimants
The Stuarts who claimed the thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland and France after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 were, with the dates of their claim:
Upon Henry's death, the succession passed to a different house, and none of the Jacobite heirs since has actually claimed the thrones of England and Scotland or incorporated the arms of England and Scotland in their coats-of-arms.
Charles Emmanuel IV of Sardinia was a descendant of Charles I through his youngest daughter Henrietta Anne. Her daughter Anne Marie of Orléans married Victor Amadeus II of Sardinia, and Charles IV was great-grandson of Queen Anne Marie in the male line.
Future descent after the Duke of Bavaria
The heir presumptive of Franz, Duke of Bavaria, is his younger brother
Alternative successions
While Franz, Duke of Bavaria, is the most universally acknowledged Stuart heir there are several others.
Alicia
If one discounts the marriage of the Duke of Bavaria's ancestress Maria Beatrice of Savoy as being invalid in British law (she married her uncle) then the succession would have passed from her to her younger sister Maria Teresa who married the Duke of Parma. Her representative today is HRH The Infanta Alicia, dowager Duchess of Calabria (b. 1917) and mother of the heir of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.[6] Those who counter this argument, are of the stance that as the marriage was concluded validly under another jurisdiction (in Sardinia)[7] it was recognised as valid in English and Scots law of the time and also in British law now.citation needed How the alternative lineage gets from Maria Beatrice to Alicia in the first place, from 1824 onwards is presented below;
| Descendent |
Portrait |
Birth |
Marriages |
Death |
Robert I, Duke of Parma
16 July 1879–
16 November 1907 |
 |
9 July 1848
Florence
son of Charles III, Duke of Parma and Louise Marie Thérèse of France |
Maria Pia of the Two Sicilies
1869
12 children
Maria Antonia of Portugal
1884
12 children |
16 November 1907
Viareggio
aged 63 |
Henry, Duke of Parma
16 November 1907–
16 November 1939 |
 |
13 June 1873
Wartegg
son of Robert I, Duke of Parma and Maria Pia of the Two Sicilies |
never married |
16 November 1939
Pianore
aged 66 |
Joseph, Duke of Parma
16 November 1939–
7 January 1950 |
 |
30 June 1875
Biarritz
son of Robert I, Duke of Parma and Maria Pia of the Two Sicilies |
never married |
7 January 1950
Pianore
aged 75 |
Elias, Duke of Parma
7 January 1950–
27 June 1959 |
 |
23 July 1880
Biarritz
son of Robert I, Duke of Parma and Maria Pia of the Two Sicilies |
Maria Anna of Austria
25 May 1903
Vienna
8 children |
27 June 1959
Friedberg
aged 79 |
Robert II, Duke of Parma
27 June 1959–
25 November 1974 |
 |
7 August 1909
Weilburg
son of Elias, Duke of Parma and Maria Anna of Austria |
never married |
25 November 1974
Vienna
aged 65 |
Elisabetta of Bourbon-Parma
25 November 1974–
13 June 1983 |
|
17 March 1904
Vienna
daughter of Elias, Duke of Parma and Maria Anna of Austria |
never married |
13 June 1983
Bad Ischl
aged 79 |
Alicia, Duchess of Calabria
13 June 1983–
present |
 |
13 November 1917
Vienna
daughter of Elias, Duke of Parma and Maria Anna of Austria |
Infante Alfonso, Duke of Calabria
30 November 1901
3 children |
|
Victor Emmanuel
In the early twentieth century Frederick Rolfe claimed that King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy was the rightful King of England, as heir to the Kings of Sardinia. Rolfe seems not to have understood that Victor Emmanuel III was not descended from that part of the house of Savoy which was descended from the Stuarts.
Elizabeth
In his book The Highland Clans, Iain Moncreiffe of that Ilk claimed that Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom "is the lawful Jacobite sovereign of this realm". Moncreiffe made the following argument:
- by the fourteenth century it had become common law (in both England and Scotland) that a person who was not born in the liegeance of the Sovereign, nor naturalised, could not have the capacity to succeed as an heir - he was in the strictest sense 'illegitimate', though not of course born out of wedlock. This legal incapacity of aliens to be heirs applied to all inheritances, whether honours or lands. The effect of the succession opening to a foreigner in Scotland was that, if he had not been naturalised or if his case was not covered by some special statute, the succession passed to the next heir 'of the blood', who thus became the only 'lawful' heir. It was of course always open to the Sovereign to confer an honour or an estate on a foreigner; the rule of law merely prevented aliens from being 'lawful heirs' to existing inheritances. In Scotland, this law was modified in favour of the French from the sixteenth century, but was otherwise rigorously applied until the Whig Revolution of 1688, after which it was gradually done away with by the mid-nineteenth century. It was precisely because of this law that Queen Anne found it necessary to pass a special Act of Parliament naturalising all alien-born potential royal heirs under her Act of Settlement of the throne. But, of course, from the Jacobite point of view, no new statute could be passed after 1688, and the old law remained static until the death of Cardinal York in 1807. At that time, his nearest heir in blood by the old (and therefore continuing Jacobite) law was not - as is sometimes supposed - the King of Sardinia, for the royal Sardine had not the legal capacity to be an heir in Scotland, unless naturalised (e.g. by marriage to the Sovereign) which he was not. The nearest lawful heir of the Cardinal York in 1807 was, in fact, curiously enough, King George III himself, who had been born in England (and therefore in the technical liegance of James VIII).
However, if Moncreiffe's theory that the "common law (in both England and Scotland) [was] that a person who was not born in the liegeance of the Sovereign, nor naturalised, could not have the capacity to succeed as an heir" were in fact correct, then James VI of Scotland could never have succeeded as James I of England in 1603. This problem, recognized in 1603, had been circumvented at the time of James's accession by the ahistorical assertion that Scotland and England had been "anciently but one" kingdom, and that the succession of the Scottish monarch to the throne of England was a "reuniting" of two parts of a single kingdom, i.e., that Scotland was not really a foreign country -- a concept emphasized by James's insistence on the use of the name Great Britain for the united realms of England and Scotland.
See also
References
External links
|